Payment OS platform selection

Design the operation around your licensed payment institution.

Payment OS selection for licensed payment institutions in Türkiye: examine merchants, POS, ledger, approvals, reconciliation and SaaS/on-premises delivery.

Highlights

An approach that fits your needs

Consider business workflows, technical scope and operational requirements together.

01

Think at institutional scale

Evaluate the network, channels and financial records rather than a single store.

02

Choose the operating model

Assess SaaS/on-premises with access, release and rollback responsibilities.

03

Give teams acceptance ownership

Let operations, finance and technology validate the same transaction chain.

·

Choosing Payment OS is different from accepting payments for a single merchant. The institution's merchant network, channels, financial records and permissions need to work together. MagicPay Payment OS is operational infrastructure for licensed payment institutions in Türkiye. This guide helps your buying team define demonstrations and acceptance around the institution's real working day.

Define the institution's role and operating boundary

Document the services you provide within your authorisation, the banks and partners you work with, and the teams responsible to merchants. MagicPay Payment OS is positioned as infrastructure for authorised payment institutions in Türkiye, not a direct store or consumer product. Technology selection should remain distinct from the institution's operating authorisation.

Build scope from workflows, not platform labels

Dgpays publicly describes platform areas including acquiring, issuing and wallets. Distinguish such broad categories from the particular workflows your institution needs. MagicPay Payment OS focuses on the shared operation of the merchant network, POS/gateway, ledger, approvals and reconciliation. Do not assume similarly named modules have identical scope: document their inputs, outputs and owners.

  • Merchant operations: application, documents, products and activation.
  • Payment operations: terminals, gateway, status queries and refunds.
  • Finance operations: commissions, deductions, payables and reconciliation.

Follow one merchant from application to reconciliation

In a Payment OS demo, open the merchant record, representative relationship, products and terminal settings for the same example. Then review payments, refunds, commissions and net payables with their linked entries. Show the permissions and approvals of operations, finance and risk teams separately. This gives you an institutional workflow rather than disconnected module presentations.

Choose operating responsibilities with SaaS or on-premises

MagicPay Payment OS can be delivered as SaaS or on-premises. Go beyond the server location: define ownership of releases, access, backups, monitoring and incident management. Installing in your data centre does not remove operating tasks; SaaS does not remove institutional governance. The proposal should set out responsibilities and acceptance conditions for your chosen model.

  • Deployment: environments, access and network boundaries.
  • Operation: releases, monitoring, backups and rollback.
  • Control: record access, change approvals and accountable owners.

Prepare institutional acceptance in three steps

Model merchants, representatives and terminals with a sample portfolio. Next test payments and financial entries using common references. Finally complete permissions, multi-approver workflows, failure handling and period-end review with the institution's teams. Base the go-live decision on their acceptance of these workflows, not merely delivery of a module list.

  • Model the network and commercial conditions.
  • Run payments, refunds, commissions and payable records.
  • Accept permissions, approvals, reconciliation and rollback scenarios.

Build the evidence file throughout the demo

Keep the permission matrix, sample transaction chain, failure-test outcome and deployment responsibilities. If load testing is required, define the environment, traffic profile and success criteria first. For a security or compliance document, check the named entity, system scope and validity period. A supplier's general statement is not acceptance evidence for your own project.

Work through your institution's target journey

This guide is for product, operations, finance and technology teams at licensed payment institutions in Türkiye. Bring your service network, existing bank/provider connections and deployment preference to MagicPay. Select a representative journey from merchant application to review of financial records, then turn it into a concrete demo scope.

Türkiye's payment-services authorisation framework is based on Law No. 6493 and related rules. Procuring software does not confer authorisation or compliance approval; the institution's own scope and obligations still apply.

Request a Demo

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to help you assess the scope.

Who is MagicPay Payment OS for? +

It is operational infrastructure for payment institutions (PFs) authorised to operate in Türkiye. A store's direct payment-acceptance needs are assessed separately through MagicGate and merchant solutions.

How should we choose between SaaS and on-premises? +

Map releases, backups, monitoring and incident ownership alongside environment and access needs. Compare the two MagicPay delivery models through this division of responsibilities.

Which workflow should lead the Payment OS demo? +

Follow one merchant from application and activation to payment, refund and reconciliation. Add representative relationships, commercial terms and approvals when they matter to your institution.